Cases 1 - 10 of 28
McIntosh v. Secretary for the S.C. Army National Guard
as 9:2023cv03969
Petitioner:
Patrick McIntosh
Respondent:
Secretary for the S.C. Army National Guard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reaves v. Schwedo et al
as 4:2023cv01911
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves and Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
Kevin Schwedo, Thomas Scott Wilkerson, Robert "Rob" Bailes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Reaves v. Dickens et al
as 4:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
Charles M. Dickens, South Carolina Highway Patrol, South Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Mazyck v. Robinson et al
as 1:2020cv02126
Defendant:
National Legal Professional Associates, Ms. Susan Troutt, Ms. Margaret A. Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Jamin Mazyck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Nations et al
as 6:2018cv01284
Plaintiff:
Joseph Myles Brown, Jr
Defendant:
Charles Nations and M B Blackmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cheatham v. Nation et al
as 6:2017cv02997
Plaintiff:
Lamar Eugene Lee Willie Cheatham
Defendant:
Charles Nation, Johnson County Detention Center and City of Laurens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chisolm v. Cain et al
as 4:2016cv03106
Plaintiff:
Clarence Chisolm
Defendant:
Timothy Cain, Paige Gossett, RBH in case 8:14-cv-3555 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Cain et al
as 4:2016cv03101
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cook
Defendant:
Timothy Cain, Paige Gossett, RBH in case 8:14-cv-3555 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muqit v. Cain et al
as 4:2016cv03103
Plaintiff:
Yahya Muqit
Defendant:
Timothy Cain, Paige Gossett, RBH in case 8:14-cv-3555 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Cain et al
as 4:2016cv03105
Plaintiff:
Robert Mitchell
Defendant:
Timothy Cain, Paige Gossett, RBH in case 8:14-cv-3555 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
