Cases 1 - 9 of 9
PERMENTER v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2022cv02892
Petitioner:
RYSHEEN PERMENTER
Respondent:
ERIC T. ARMEL, DEBORAH I. CARPENTER, JOHN J. TALABER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Anderson v. Kauffman et al
as 1:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Rodney Anderson
Defendant:
K. Kauffman, J. Rivello, Ms. C. Neri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brennan v. Fisher et al
as 3:2015cv02092
Plaintiff:
Wesley Brennan
Defendant:
Krista Fisher, Christine Neri and David Morningstar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. REINAKER et al
as 5:2015cv05106
Plaintiff:
WILLIE MACK YOUNG
Defendant:
DENNIS E. REINAKER, RICHARD SIMMS, RICHARD GRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv05762
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JEFFREY A. BEARD, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOMEZ et al v. SCI GRATERFORD PRISON AND STAFF et al
as 2:2011cv00307
Plaintiff:
JAVIER GOMEZ and ELIZABETH GOMEZ
Defendant:
SCI GRATERFORD PRISON AND STAFF , DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, J. BLUME and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NICHOLAS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. et al
as 2:2008cv02548
Plaintiff:
DARREN L. NICHOLAS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL., CINDY WATSON, DAVID . DiGUGLIELMO and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SIERRA v. ENTITIES TO THE PENAL COLONIES OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2008cv02003
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO SIERRA
Defendant:
ENTITIES TO THE PENAL COLONIES OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, JOHN K. MURRAY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RICHES v. NERI et al
as 2:2008cv00251
Petitioner:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent:
EMILIANO NERI, PATRICE G. ADCROFT and FCI WILLIAMSBURG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
