Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Smith v. New Haven Police Department
as 1:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
Russell Henry Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
New Haven Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spears v. New Haven Police Department et al
as 3:2020cv01652
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Spears
Defendant:
John Doe and New Haven Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cabasquini v. New Haven Police Department
as 3:2019cv01873
Defendant:
City of New Haven Police Department
Plaintiff:
Angel Luis Cabasquini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. New Haven et al
as 3:2018cv02133
Defendant:
John Doe, New Haven Police Department, City of New Haven and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliphant v. Villano
as 17-3210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Wayne Oliphant
Defendant - Appellee:
Mark Sheppard, William Onofrio, Darlene Passapera, AKA Jane Doe #1 and others
McKinney v. New Haven Police Department et al
as 3:2017cv01663
Plaintiff:
William J. McKinney
Defendant:
New Haven Police Department, Campbell, N. Gotzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. New Haven Police Department et al
as 3:2016cv01150
Plaintiff:
Richard Benson
Defendant:
New Haven Police Department, Dean Esserman, Brendon Borer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodhouse v. New Haven Police Department et al
as 3:2015cv00595
Plaintiff:
Lamar Woodhouse
Defendant:
New Haven Police Department, John Doe and K-9-Police Dog
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donaby v. Senior et al
as 3:2014cv00890
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Donaby
Defendant:
Christopher Senior, Ekrem Halim, S. Biros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliphant v. Villano
as 14-1077
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Anthony Wayne Oliphant
Defendant:
Mark Sheppard, William Onofrio, Darlene Passapera, AKA Jane Doe #1 and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Robert Villano
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
