Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Grady-Wilkins #605313 v. Newton et al
as 1:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
Jake Darnell Grady-Wilkins #605313
Defendant:
Unknown Newton, Kent County Correctional Facility and Kent, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkins #742687 v. Gauderer et al
as 1:2022cv00983
Plaintiff:
Allen Atkins #742687
Defendant:
Christian Ernst Gauderer, Heidi E. Washington, David Dawdy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkins #742687 v. Dawdy et al
as 2:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Allen Atkins #742687
Defendant:
David Dawdy, Unknown Party #1, J. Fair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rouse et al v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 5:2021cv12670
Plaintiff:
Arthur J. Rouse, John Moore, David Sarfo and others
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, State of Michigan, MDOC and others
Anderson #979199 v. Newton
as 2:2021cv00124
Defendant:
C. Newton
Plaintiff:
Jerry Anderson #979199, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams #225280 v. Carlson et al
as 2:2021cv00039
Defendant:
Richard D. Russell, Michael R. Dean, Dana Nessel and others
Plaintiff:
Donnell Williams #225280
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams #225280 v. Carlson et al
as 2:2020cv00103
Defendant:
Richard D. Russell, Michael R. Dean, Dana Nessel and others
Plaintiff:
Donnell Williams #225280
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith #240397 v. Koben et al
as 2:2020cv00024
Defendant:
Candace M. Newton, Unknown Koben and Michael LaCrosse
Plaintiff:
Sampson Lee Smith #240397
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson #602273 v. Desrochers et al
as 2:2018cv00156
Defendant:
R. Benson, Unknown Dihle, R. Batho and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Reginald Robinson #602273
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams #225280 v. Washington et al
as 2:2018cv00144
Defendant:
Unknown Dewit, Unknown Bigger, Michael McClean and others
Plaintiff:
Donnell Williams #225280
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
