Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Stinson v. Sec., Department of Corrections
as 3:2020cv01202
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Noni Jamil Stinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stinson v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2020cv23883
Plaintiff:
Noni Jamil Stinson
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Larry Barber v. Steven Vershel
as 13-13412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY JAMES BARBER
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVEN M. VERSHEL, Trooper FHP, ANGELA BOTERO and PATRICIA NANZ, a.k.a. Patricia Noni
Larry Barber v. Steven Vershel, et al
as 13-11824
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY JAMES BARBER
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN M. VERSHEL, Trooper FHP, ANGELA BOTERO and PATRICIA NANZ, a.k.a. Patricia Noni
Larry Barber v. Steven Vershel, et al
as 13-11237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY JAMES BARBER
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN M. VERSHEL, Trooper FHP, ANGELA BOTERO and PATRICIA NANZ, a.k.a. Patricia Noni
NONIS v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2012cv04469
Plaintiff:
ELIEZER NONIS
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, MIDDLESEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Barber v. Steven Vershel, et al
as 10-14370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY JAMES BARBER
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN M. VERSHEL, Trooper FHP, ANGELA BOTERO and PATRICIA NANZ, a.k.a. Patricia Noni
Whitmore v. Anderson et al
as 5:2010cv05046
Plaintiff:
Clarence E. Whitmore
Defendant:
Brian Anderson, Luann Van Hunnik, Nonie Lunder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. Doe et al
as 0:2009cv60635
Plaintiff:
Larry James Barber
Defendant:
John Doe, Steven M. Vershel, Sheriff of Broward County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
