Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Earle v. Coleman et al
as 2:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Vivian Alexander Earle
Defendant:
Unknown Coleman, Unknown Nunez, Unknown Formato and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alarcon #291020 v. Ochoa et al
as 2:2023cv02587
Plaintiff:
Javier Velazquez Alarcon
Defendant:
W Ochoa, Unknown Castregon, F Aruizu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman #050101 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02324
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Freeman
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Justin A Newsome, Diana Curd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Carrillo v. USA
as 2:2023cv02136
Petitioner:
Francisco Nunez Carrillo
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Nunez v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08503
Plaintiff:
Juan F Nunez
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valentini v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00936
Plaintiff:
Rick Valentini
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Ibarra, Unknown Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunez v. Maricopa County Attorney et al
as 2:2022cv01939
Petitioner:
Frank Nunez
Respondent:
Maricopa County Attorney, Arizona, State of, David Shinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valentini #268586 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01612
Plaintiff:
Rick Valentini
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Ibarra, Patrick O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrillo v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv01742
Petitioner:
Francisco Nunez Carrillo
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garcia #043464 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv01548
Petitioner:
Frank Nunez Garcia
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
