Cases 1 - 10 of 21
RIECO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Defendant:
MICAHEL ZAKEN, MARK HAMMER, WILLIAM NICHOLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STUBBS v. SKREPENAK et al
as 1:2022cv00940
Plaintiff:
Henry Christopher Stubbs, III
Defendant:
Gregory A. Skrepenak, Todd Vonderheid, Stephen A. Urban and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STUBBS v. SKREPENAK et al
as 2:2022cv00889
Plaintiff:
HENRY CHRISTOPHER STUBBS, III
Defendant:
GREGORY A. SKREPENAK, TODD VONDERHEID, STEPHEN A. URBAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIECO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv00688
Defendant:
C/O 2 LARRY LEWIS, C/O1 JEREMIAH LEWIS, DR. STANLEY LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Olson v. USA
as 3:2021cv00493
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Olson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Olson v. Finley et al
as 1:2021cv00387
Respondent:
Michael Carvajal and Scott J. Finley
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Olson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gorbey v. Geisinger Eye Center Owners & Rueters et al
as 3:2020cv02433
Defendant:
Edinger, D. Fassero, A. Duttry and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Owl-Feather Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Owl Feather-Gorbey v. Olson et al
as 3:2020cv01713
Defendant:
A. Duttry, Unknown Named Owners at Rueters Geisinger Eye Institute, Dr. Joanna Marie Olson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
OLSON v. OVERMYER et al
as 3:2018cv00056
Petitioner:
JEFFREY ALAN OLSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
OLSON v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2018cv00373
Petitioner:
JEFFREY ALAN OLSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
