Cases 1 - 10 of 165
HALLE v. PARKER et al
as 2:2024cv00581
Petitioner:
WILLIAM HALLE
Respondent:
JUSTIN PARKER and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YOUNG v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
BRYANT YOUNG
Defendant:
SECRETARY DR. LAUREL HARRY, SECRETARY GEORGE LITTLE, DEPUTY SECRETARY T. FERGUSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilding v. Scranton CCC Center (SDTP) et al
as 3:2023cv01879
Plaintiff:
Shawn Wilding
Defendant:
Scranton CCC Center (SDTP), Scranton GEO, Jeffrey James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. HENRY et al
as 2:2023cv01686
Plaintiff:
AKIL ASIM JOHNSON
Defendant:
MICHELLE HENRY, MICHAEL ZAKEN, STEPHEN BUZAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. USA
as 1:2023cv01560
Petitioner:
Travis Parker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PARKER v. TICE, et al
as 2:2023cv01654
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN PARKER
Defendant:
E. TICE, M. HOUSER, M. PYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SANDERS v. COULEHAN et al
as 2:2023cv00737
Plaintiff:
GIOVANNI SANDERS
Defendant:
D. COULEHAN, E. HURD, CO. D. LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PARKER v. WALKER et al
as 2:2023cv01609
Petitioner:
BRAHEIM PARKER
Respondent:
TINA WALKER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Barraza
as 1:2023cv00455
Petitioner:
Ricardo Kevin Parker
Respondent:
Warden Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Parker v. Kyper et al
as 1:2023cv00383
Plaintiff:
Donte Lamar Parker
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Kyper and Correctional Officer Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
