Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Brooks v. Hawkins County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Defendant:
Ronnie Lawson, Dallas Dunn, Dean and others
Plaintiff:
Donnie Ray Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. Phillips
as 3:2024cv01003
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips
Petitioner:
Elvin Hubie Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunlap v. Fish et al
as 3:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dunlap
Defendant:
Robin Fish, Lakeia Wells, f/n/u Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton v. Cambell et al
as 3:2022cv00490
Plaintiff:
Antonio Anthony Walton
Defendant:
Officer Madison Cambell, Officer M. Stewart, Officer f/n/u Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crockett v. Mays et al
as 3:2022cv00260
Plaintiff:
Antonio Marquise Crockett
Defendant:
Warden Tony Mays, f/n/u Fish, f/n/u Winsted and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
as 2:2022cv02202
Petitioner:
Harry W. Pearson
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Tennessee and Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pearson v. Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
as 3:2021cv00908
Petitioner:
Harry W. Pearson
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pearson v. Frink
as 2:2021cv02752
Petitioner:
Harry W. Pearson
Respondent:
Warden Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pearson v. Shelby County Division Correction et al
as 2:2019cv02278
Defendant:
Thomas Young, Shelby County Division Correction, Reese Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crowe v. Pounders et al
as 2:2018cv02885
Defendant:
AWO Jones, Nurse Practitioners (2), Core Civic and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Neal Crowe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
