Cases 1 - 10 of 195
PHILLIPS v. ERNEST et al
as 2:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
ERNEST, JACKSON, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. MJEAN et al
as 2:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
MJEAN, NEFF and HEOLTERBRAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. ELLIS et al
as 2:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
MIKE ELLIS, JESSE and C. POPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Verizon Wireless et al
as 3:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Victor D Phillips, Jr
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless and Boost Moble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. MJEAN et al
as 2:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
MJEAN, NEFF and HEOLTERBRAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. JACKSON et al
as 2:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
JACKSON, NALL, K. PADGETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUTERI v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, CARGILL MANUFACTURING, INCORPORATED, GOOD SOURCE SOLUTIONS and others
Interested Party:
GLENN ANDREW SCUTERI, TIFFANY ROSE SCUTERI and TRICIA PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Staton et al
as 3:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Victor D Phillips, Jr
Defendant:
Brock M. Staton, M Lester and M Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. South Bend Indiana et al
as 3:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Victor D Phillips, Jr
Defendant:
South Bend Indiana, Indiana The State of, Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. VANIHEIL
as 2:2024cv00120
Petitioner:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Respondent:
VANIHEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
