Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Stephens v. Pitts et al
as 2:2024cv02430
Plaintiff:
Barry Stephens
Defendant:
Lt. Pitts, B. Chamber, Lt. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Wardlow
as 1:2024cv01043
Petitioner:
Kelly Lee Pitts
Respondent:
Jerry Wardlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pitts v. USA
as 2:2023cv00043
Petitioner:
Kendell Pitts
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pitts v. Aramark Food Service et al
as 2:2023cv02137
Plaintiff:
Christian Pitts
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service, Shelby County Sheriff Office, Wellpath Healthcare Provider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitt v. Thornton et al
as 4:2020cv00016
Defendant:
Dr Jones, William Harold, Mike Pitts and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Kenneth Whitt, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2019mc00012
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, C.C.A.'s Well Path Medical, Core Civic of America and others
Plaintiff:
Arras Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ogletree, Jr v. Pitts et al
as 3:2018cv01027
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Ogletree, Jr
Defendant:
Murfreesboro Police Department, Chris Pitts and Officer (f/n/u) Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv01364
Petitioner:
Roosevelt Pitts
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Palmer v. Lincoln County Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 4:2016cv00015
Plaintiff:
Christopher Palmer, Jr.
Defendant:
Lincoln County Sheriff's Dept, Shannon Bostic, Doug Boernger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. Lincoln County Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 3:2016cv00381
Plaintiff:
Christopher Palmer, Jr.
Defendant:
Lincoln County Sheriffs Dept., Shannon Bostic, Doug Boernger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
