Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Palmer v. Norfolk Sheriff et al
as 2:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
James Dion Palmer
Defendant:
Norfolk Sheriff, Glenn Youngkin and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv05773
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Allen Cook
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Mark Wentworth, Leigh Gilliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Norfolk City Sheriff et al
as 2:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
James Dion Palmer
Defendant:
Norfolk City Sheriff, Doe 1 and Norfolk City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Haynes et al
as 3:2022cv05492
Plaintiff:
James L Johnson, III
Defendant:
Ron Haynes, Rob Schreiber, Gina Penrose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Snohomish County Jail
as 2:2022cv00152
Petitioner:
James Dion Palmer
Respondent:
Snohomish County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brandon v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv05417
Plaintiff:
Myron G Brandon
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Joan Palmer, Mark Wentworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Palmer et al
as 3:2021cv05397
Plaintiff:
Ashton W Thomas
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections and Joan Marie Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Hopkins et al
as 2:2021cv00361
Plaintiff:
Jamall S Baker
Defendant:
Hopkins, Melinda Tuggle, Tammy O'Reilly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griepsma v. Andersen et al
as 2:2021cv00302
Defendant:
Vitaliy Boychenko, G Garcia, Jacob Grillo and others
Plaintiff:
James David Griepsma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv06232
Plaintiff:
Ashton W Thomas
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Joan M Palmer and Daniel W White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
