Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Lee v. Calloway et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Rashad C. Lee
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway, Pamela Harris and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gordon v. Carter et al
as 1:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Justin Terrell Gordon
Defendant:
Karen Carter and Steven T. Marshall
Respondent:
Rolanda Calloway and Pamela Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dailey v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00157
Defendant:
Mr. Ellis, Camille Luckie, Pamela Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Malon Jermaine Dailey and Marlon Jermaine Dailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Lewis et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00955
Plaintiff:
Rodney Terrell Brown
Defendant:
Victor Nieves, Pamela Harris, Derius Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luther v. Townsend et al
as 2:2018cv00438
Plaintiff:
Timothy Luther
Defendant:
Althea C. Townsend, Brian Gordon, Mikeon Person and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00160
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bartholomew Clark
Defendant:
Karla Walker Jones, Pamela Harris, Charlotte Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00294
Plaintiff:
Dedric Jamar Dean
Defendant:
Karla Jones , Eric Evans , Pamela Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGowan v. Thomas et al
as 1:2017cv00119
Plaintiff:
Montez McGowan
Defendant:
Jimmy Thomas, Karla Jones, Pamela Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brent Jacoby v. Warden, et al
as 16-10782
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENT JACOBY
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, PAMELA HARRIS, Cpt. and COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
