Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Blake v. Jordan et al
as 6:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Tony Kent Blake
Defendant:
Suzanne Jordan, Terry Parks, Choctaw County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villasana v. Jordan et al
as 6:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Joe Luis Villasana
Defendant:
Suzanne Jordan, Terry Park, Choctaw County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindamood v. Jordan et al
as 6:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
James Kevin Lindamood
Defendant:
Suzanne Jordan, Terry Park, Choctaw County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. Fritcher et al
as 6:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Allen Alexander Parks
Defendant:
Eric Fritcher and Tara Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atchison v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2021cv00286
Plaintiff:
Corey A Atchison and Corey Atchison
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, Robert Jackson, Gary Meek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County et al
as 5:2020cv00205
Defendant:
Lauren Perez, Deputy FNU Boren, Sarah Reeves and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Alexander Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parke v. United States of America
as 5:2020cv00117
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jeremy Shawn Parke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Parks v. Taylor et al
as 5:2019cv01188
Defendant:
Ricardel Wilson, Gene Bradley, Ronnie Neal and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Alexander Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Taylor et al
as 5:2019cv01137
Defendant:
Sean McKeehan, Tadasha Morris, Jason Everhart and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Alexander Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ezell v. Hininger et al
as 6:2019cv00302
Plaintiff:
James Ezell, James R. Ezell and James Ezell, III
Defendant:
David Cincotta, Gentry, Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
