Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Kinchloe v. Eyke et al
as 2:2018cv13214
Defendant:
Paul Eyke, John Doe, Esmaeli Emami and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Kinchloe
Finley #266147 v. Mleko et al
as 2:2017cv00159
Plaintiff:
Timothy Finley #266147
Defendant:
Steve Mleko, Martin Hedlund, Adam Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finley #266147 v. Salmi et al
as 2:2017cv00149
Plaintiff:
Timothy Finley #266147
Defendant:
Mandi Salmi, Robert Napel and Paul Eyke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson #282320 v. Meden et al
as 2:2016cv00236
Plaintiff:
Curtis O. Jackson #282320
Defendant:
Terry Meden, Paul Eyke, Mark Hares and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander #731077 v. Salmi et al
as 2:2016cv00096
Plaintiff:
Dandre Alexander #731077
Defendant:
Mandi Joy Salmi, Tom Osier, Robin Bailey-Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Threatt v. Paul Eyke, et al
as 14-2198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY THREATT, named on complaint as Anthony Allen Threatt - El
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL EYKE, Unit Chief of the Psychologist at M.B.P., UNKNOWN PLACE, Deputy Warden, JIM ALEXANDER, Deputy Warden and others
Threatt #182625 v. Eyke et al
as 2:2014cv00144
Plaintiff:
Anthony Threatt #182625
Defendant:
Paul Eyke, Unknown Place, Jim Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones #364868 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00363
Plaintiff:
Samuel Roosevelt Jones #364868
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Paul Eyke, Mandi Salmi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gresham #272603 v. Meder et al
as 2:2013cv00212
Plaintiff:
Michael Gresham #272603
Defendant:
Terry Meder, Kirtida A. Patel, Neil Fred Pascue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gresham #272603 v. Dahl et al
as 2:2012cv00021
Plaintiff:
Michael Gresham #272603
Defendant:
Nicole Dahl, Robert Napel, Unknown Sanderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
