Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Petty v. Butler et al
as 1:2023cv00026
Petitioner:
Garon Jaquez Petty and Gavon Jaquez Petty
Respondent:
Michael Wood, Steve Marshall and Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Petty v. Taylor et al (INMATE 1)(MEMBER)
as 3:2021cv00552
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Petty
Defendant:
Heath Taylor, Wayne Johnson, Sergeant Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. Russell County et al (INMATE 1)(MEMBER)
as 3:2021cv00522
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Petty
Defendant:
Russell County, Sergeant Hood, Corp. Shay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. Taylor et al (INMATE 1)(MEMBER)
as 3:2021cv00511
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Petty
Defendant:
Russell County Jail, Heath Taylor, Wayne Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. Stanley et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2021cv00464
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Petty
Defendant:
Justin Stanley, Sargent Thompson and Officer Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. Speights et al
as 6:2011cv02444
Plaintiff:
Melvin Glenn Petty
Defendant:
Alvin Speights, Victoria Colvin, Grand Prarie Computation Center - Texas and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. Price et al
as 5:2008cv00265
Petitioner:
Ross Oneal Petty
Respondent:
Cheryl Price and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Long v. Reed et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2007cv00581
Plaintiff:
James Long
Defendant:
M. Reed, Sgt. Kursey, CO Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pettis v. DeLoach et al
as 5:2007cv00168
Petitioner:
Fred R Pettis
Respondent:
James DeLoach, James DeLoach, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
