Cases 1 - 10 of 13
McKenna v. Conway
as 1:2024cv02161
Plaintiff:
Kevin H. McKenna
Defendant:
Matthew R. Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mckenna v. Conway
as 1:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
Kevin H. Mckenna
Defendant:
Matthew R. Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Conway et al
as 3:2019cv03988
Defendant:
T Foss, R. Conway, B. Mustafa and others
Plaintiff:
Mali W. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conway v. Esmerlda Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2019cv00128
Defendant:
Esmeralda County Jail, Matthew Kirkland, Esmeralda Sheriffs Office and others
Plaintiff:
Gary R. Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conway v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00019
Plaintiff:
Gary R. Conway
Defendant:
Sgt. Matthew Kirkland and Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Muniz et al
as 3:2015cv02519
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Evans
Defendant:
W. Muniz, D. A. Asuncion, P. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Million v. Kostecky et al
as 4:2014cv02163
Plaintiff:
Charlie Lee Million
Defendant:
K. Kostecky, J. Soto, R. Mojica and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 4:2013cv04969
Plaintiff:
Shannon White and Charlie Lee Million
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., J. D. Lozano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Treandous Cotton v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 12-15829
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TREANDOUS A. COTTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden, Warden, G. A. NEOTTI, Deputy Chief and others
Clarke v. Cate et al
as 3:2012cv00382
Plaintiff:
Anthony Clarke
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, S. Kernan, A. Hedgpeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.