Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00348
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Davis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv01202
Plaintiff: Iklas R. Davis
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons, Staff of FCI-Schuylkill, Warden Beth Rickard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DAVIES v. USA
as 2:2019cv00352
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: ROBERT R DAVIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DAVIES v. USA
as 2:2019cv00359
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: ROBERT R DAVIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Davis v. PA Board of Probation and Parole et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv01206
Petitioner: Darrell R. Davis
Respondent: PA Board of Probation and Parole and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bailey v. Kane et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv02105
Plaintiff: Ari Bailey
Defendant: Thomas R. Kane, Blake R. Davis, M. D. Caravajal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BOYD et al v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2011cv05712
Plaintiff: BURNS TILTON BOYD
Defendant: DEANA R. DAVIS, JOHN H. ADAMS, MARY T. HOLLIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. CAMERON et al
as 3:2011cv00091
Petitioner: JOEL R. DAVIS
Respondent: KENNETH R. CAMERON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hatten v. Young et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv02660
Defendant: D. Young, W. Zegarski, J. Adimi and others
Plaintiff: Timothy Hatten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DAVIES v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00329
Plaintiff: RUSTY R. DAVIES
Defendant: DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE and DAVID MASKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?