Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Abdikarim v. Emerson et al
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Ayannah Charette, Kent Cameron Carlson, City of Fargo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdikarim v. Emerson et al
as 3:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Paul R. Emerson and Kimberly Higvick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdikarim v. Fitzgibbons et al
as 3:2024cv00098
Defendant:
Barry Fitzgibbons, Conor R West, Tim Brennan and others
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schuh v. Burgum et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Schuh
Defendant:
Doug Burgum, Dave Krabbenhoft, Colby Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garmoo v. USA
as 1:2022cv00107
Petitioner:
Mario R. Garmoo
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Schuh v. Balaban et al
as 1:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Schuh
Defendant:
Steven Balaban and Tessa M. Vaagen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schuh et al v. Burgum et al
as 1:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Schuh and Adam S. Hamilton
Defendant:
Governor Doug Burgum, Dave Krabbenhoft, James Sayler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schuh v. State of North Dakota
as 1:2022cv00009
Petitioner:
Ricky R. Schuh
Respondent:
State of North Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BraveBull v. FBOP et al
as 1:2021cv00221
Plaintiff:
Pamela BraveBull
Defendant:
FBOP, F.C.I. Waseca, MN, Warden M. Starr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schuh v. Burleigh Morton Detention Center et al
as 1:2020cv00142
Defendant:
Eric LNU, FNU Howe and Burleigh Morton Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Schuh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.