Cases 1 - 10 of 137
Nance v. Reynolds et al
as 8:2024cv03142
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nance
Defendant:
Don Reynolds, Randall Sammons, Steven Wix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Simpson v. SCDC
as 8:2023cv03204
Petitioner:
Randall Simpson
Respondent:
SCDC and Warden of Kershaw Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Missouri v. Allen et al
as 8:2023cv01990
Plaintiff:
Vincent Missouri
Defendant:
John P Allen, Brian Kendall, Bryan Stirling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Doe v. Bessac et al
as 4:2023cv00684
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Daniel Bessac, Bobby York, Bryan Jay Koon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Carpenter, Jr v. Berkeley County Detention Center et al
as 9:2022cv04037
Plaintiff:
James Randall Carpenter, Jr
Defendant:
Berkeley County Detention Center, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Uknown Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Randall v. USA
as 4:2022cv03074
Petitioner:
Joshua Lee Randall
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Palmer v. South Carolina Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv02309
Plaintiff:
Herbert Palmer, Jr.
Defendant:
South Carolina Dept. of Corrections, Regional Director Randall L. Williams, Warden Charles Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Chapman v. Williams et al
as 2:2022cv01416
Plaintiff:
David M. Chapman
Defendant:
Randall Williams, Lavern Cohen and Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Randall v. USA
as 4:2021cv03324
Petitioner:
Cliff Bernard Randall
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Reid v. Williams et al
as 2:2021cv03090
Plaintiff:
Brittany Reid
Defendant:
Randall Williams, Ann Sheppard, Timothy Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
