Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Washington v. Perez Badge no. 3272 et al
as 2:2023cv08623
Plaintiff:
Jerome Washington
Defendant:
C.O. Perez Badge no. 3272, Sheriff Edward Reilly, Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pizarro v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv02125
Plaintiff:
Robert Pizarro
Defendant:
United States of America, Margaret Graham, Jessica Fender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2022cv01694
Plaintiff:
Rona Love
Defendant:
City Of New York, Faye Yelardy, James Reilly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pizarro v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv06991
Defendant:
Christian McNeal, Hector Pagan, Matthew Noftsier and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Pizarro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yates v. N.Y. State Dep. Corr Ser et al
as 9:2017cv01227
Plaintiff:
Phillip Yates
Defendant:
N.Y. State Dep. Corr Ser, Anthony Annucci, Greene Corr Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Opperisano v. Reilly et al
as 1:2017cv05089
Plaintiff:
Joseph Opperisano
Defendant:
Alyson Reilly and Thomas Reilly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yates v. N.Y. State Dep. Corr Ser et al
as 1:2017cv06504
Plaintiff:
Phillip Yates
Defendant:
N.Y. State Dep. Corr Ser, Anthony Annucci, Greene Corr Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romano v. Levitt et al
as 9:2017cv00137
Plaintiff:
Anthony Romano
Defendant:
Doctor Weinstock , Doctor Kooi , A. Cincotta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romano v. Levitt et al
as 1:2015cv00518
Plaintiff:
Anthony Romano
Defendant:
Levitt, S. Leuthe, Weinstach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brisman v. Graham et al
as 9:2015cv00712
Plaintiff:
Jason Brisman
Defendant:
Harold D. Graham, Quinn, Volpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
