Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Johnson v. Indiana Dept. Correction Staff et al
as 1:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
Robert Carl Johnson, Carl Johnson and Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Indiana Dept. Correction Staff, Goodwill Industries, South Bend Community Reentry Ctr. and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Indiana Dept. Correction Staff et al
as 3:2023cv00689
Plaintiff:
Robert Carl Johnson, Carl Johnson and Robert Johnson
Defendant:
South Bend Community Reentry Ctr., Unknown Resident, Indiana Dept. Correction Staff and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. WEXFORD MEDICAL et al
as 2:2020cv00247
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOHNSON
Defendant:
SUE SMOOTHY, RYAN SCHNARR and WEXFORD MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Warden
as 3:2018cv00531
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Robert Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Warden
as 3:2018cv00527
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Robert Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VERMILLION v. PLANK
as 1:2015cv00605
Defendant:
DOUG BARNES, GARY BRENNAN, DAWN BUSS and others
Unknown:
Timothy Allon Renfro, Jr., Timothy Allon Renfro, Jr., Timothy Allon Renfro, Jr. and others
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only) and PENDLETON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
JAY F. VERMILLION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. WILSON
as 1:2012cv01600
Petitioner:
ROBERT JOHNSON
Respondent:
BILL WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vermillion v. Plank et al
as 3:2011cv00280
Plaintiff:
Jay F Vermillion
Defendant:
Willard Plank, Charles Whelan, Dawn Buss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
