Cases 1 - 10 of 164
RUSSELL v. ROBINSON et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
TODD A. RUSSELL
Defendant:
NOAH ROBINSON and KHRISTINA PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeil v. Watts et al
as 3:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Mickel McNeil and Mickel J. McNeil
Defendant:
Watts, G- Lewis, Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. Wheeler et al
as 3:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
John Sims
Defendant:
Wheeler, Monerpenny, Raglin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRAME v. MART et al
as 1:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
DEBORA JANE FRAME
Defendant:
RUBEN MART, KYLE GIBBONS, KRISTIE COMPTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeil v. Watts et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Mickel McNeil and Mickel J. McNeil
Defendant:
Watts, G- Lewis, Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. St Joesph County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Larry Robinson
Defendant:
St Joesph County Jail and Sam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00010
Petitioner:
ANTHONY LEVON ROBINSON, JR.
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BROWN v. ROBINSON et al
as 3:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
GEORGE D. BROWN
Defendant:
NOAH ROBINSON and VANDERBURGH COUNTY GRIEVANCE CONTROL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Carlos Robinson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
