Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Rodgers v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02549
Petitioner:
DeCarlos Rodgers
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rodgers v. Hamblen County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
Stormy Rodgers and R.O.R
Defendant:
Hamblen County, Tennessee, Sheriff Esco Jarnagin, Captain Teresa Laws and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moffett v. Hardeman County et al
as 1:2022cv01045
Plaintiff:
Cameron Moffett
Defendant:
Hardeman County, Hardeman County Correctional Facilities Corporation, CoreCivic Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Childress v. CoreCivic et al
as 1:2021cv01148
Plaintiff:
James L. Childress
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Samuel Rodgers and Whiteville Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porterfield v. Shelby County Crim. Justice Center et al
as 2:2021cv02528
Plaintiff:
Issac Porterfield
Defendant:
Shelby County Crim. Justice Center, Floyd Bonner, Jr., Mr. Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porterfield v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center et al
as 2:2021cv02503
Plaintiff:
Issac Porterfield
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center, Dr. O. Webb, Dr. Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Owens et al
as 2:2021cv02270
Defendant:
Creig Pickles, Doe and Owens
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ray Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadway v. Myers
as 3:2020cv00316
Petitioner:
Rodger E Broadway
Respondent:
Kevin Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodgers v. Tennessee Department of Corrections
as 2:2020cv02280
Petitioner:
Frederick S. Rodgers
Respondent:
Tennessee Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams et al v. Parker et al
as 1:2019cv00296
Plaintiff:
James Spann, John Saulsberry, Roy Rodgers and others
Defendant:
Tony Parker and Lee Dodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
