Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Younan #173538 v. Rosas
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Stewart E Younan
Defendant:
Reuben Parra Rosas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romeo #266244 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv02153
Plaintiff:
James Elliott Romeo
Defendant:
David Shinn, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, Unknown McAdorey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nigoa v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv01932
Plaintiff:
Rosa Nigoa
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Clint Hickman and Dawn Noggle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arteaga v. Penzone
as 2:2023cv01746
Plaintiff:
Rosa Maria Arteaga
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv01132
Plaintiff:
Rosa Guadalupe Ramos
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and Maricopa County Estrella Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Maricopa County Superior Court et al
as 2:2022cv00972
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Maricopa County Superior Court and Rosa Peng Mroz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00544
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Arnulfo Rosas Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Osorio-Rosas #272230 v. Shinn
as 2:2021cv00102
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Emelio Osorio-Rosas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Osorio-Rosas #272230 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv02130
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Emelio Osorio-Rosas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Quiroz v. USA
as 4:2020cv00414
Petitioner:
Rosa Quiroz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
