Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Mendoza v. USA
as 3:2023cv00681
Petitioner:
Rudy Mendoza
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SIMPSON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON et al
as 3:2020cv00009
Defendant:
CHAPLAIN OF CANAAN USP, IAN CONNORS, C. GOMEZ and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE RUSSELL SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TAVERAS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv06163
Defendant:
OFFICER CHRISTOPHER HULMES, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICERS DOE 1-3
Plaintiff:
RUDY TAVERAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2017cv01152
Petitioner:
RUDY DAVIS
Respondent:
MARK CAPOZZA, ALLEGHENY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MENDOZA v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2015cv00191
Petitioner:
RUDY MENDOZA
Respondent:
BRIAN H. THOMPSON and REBECCA CALISTI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gonzalez v. Baltazar
as 1:2014cv02164
Petitioner:
Rudi Gonzalez
Respondent:
Juan Baltazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PUENTES-CANALES v. WIGGINS
as 3:2014cv00133
Petitioner:
RUDY ISMAEL PUENTES-CANALES
Respondent:
GEORGE WIGGINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BROOKINS v. BRISTOL TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2014cv00252
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID BROOKINS
Defendant:
BRISTOL TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, ALDRED H. EASTLACK, RUDLOPH RUDY HEIERLING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CIPKO v. PHILADELPHIA HEALTH SYSTEM
as 2:2013cv03324
Plaintiff:
DAVID RUDY CIPKO
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA HEALTH SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Naranjo v. Warden, USP Lewisburg
as 3:2012cv02612
Petitioner:
Rudy Naranjo
Respondent:
Warden, USP Lewisburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
