Cases 1 - 10 of 39
VILCHUCK et al v. HARMON et al
as 1:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
SETH A. VILCHUCK
Defendant:
AUSTIN HARMON, TRENT ALLEN, QUENTIN RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARTLOW v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02207
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. PARTLOW
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CHARLENE BURKETT, A. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whittenburg v. Lake County Facility et al
as 2:2023cv00425
Plaintiff:
Garrett Whittenburg
Defendant:
Lake County Facility, Medical, Correctional Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARREN v. CHAMBERS et al
as 1:2023cv01964
Plaintiff:
LARRY WARREN
Defendant:
LONI YOLANDA CHAMBERS, DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARTLOW v. RUIZ
as 1:2023cv01619
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. PARTLOW
Defendant:
RUIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Oswald et al
as 3:2023cv00759
Plaintiff:
Jerome Davis
Defendant:
Oswald, Creasy, Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOPEZ-RUIZ v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00334
Petitioner:
ISIDRO LOPEZ-RUIZ
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LOPEZ-RUIZ v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00260
Plaintiff:
ISIDRO LOPEZ-RUIZ
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, M. ELLIS, MEEK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Sheriff
as 3:2023cv00387
Plaintiff:
Victor L Jordan and Victor Lee Jordan
Defendant:
Sheriff, Warden, Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wimmer v. Gipson et al
as 3:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
James Wimmer
Defendant:
Ishmael Gipson, WCC Medical Staff and Roberto Ruiz
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
