Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Smith-El v. A Construction Company et al
as 4:2016cv01743
Plaintiff:
Jonathan D. Smith-El
Defendant:
A Construction Company, State of Missouri, City of St. Louis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Box v. Rosenstengel et al
as 4:2015cv01273
Plaintiff:
Keith Box
Defendant:
Nancy J Rosenstengel, Michael Jordan, Michael J Reagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Oliver et al
as 1:2015cv00125
Plaintiff:
Glen E. Brown
Defendant:
Russ Oliver and Andy Rehmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russ v. St. Louis City Justice Center
as 4:2015cv00947
Plaintiff:
Troy Russ
Defendant:
St. Louis City Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luh v. Fulton State Hospital et al
as 2:2013cv04189
Plaintiff:
Todd James Luh
Defendant:
Fulton State Hospital, John Lyskowski, John Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Russell et al
as 6:2013cv03223
Plaintiff:
Samuel H. Williams
Defendant:
Terry Russell, State of Missouri, Unknown Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shannon v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2013cv01047
Plaintiff:
William Shannon
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Board of Probation and Parole, Russ Dineen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Russell et al
as 4:2013cv00969
Plaintiff:
Samuel H. Williams
Defendant:
Terry Russell, State of Missouri, Unknown Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 4:2007cv00649
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Stewart C. Hudson, George W. Bush, Paul D. Clement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wahid v. Bond et al
as 2:2007cv04128
Plaintiff:
Hakim M. Wahid
Defendant:
Kevin C Bond, Hardgrave, Greg White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
