Cases 1 - 10 of 173
Butler v. Barnett et al
as 1:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
Marcus Quin Butler
Defendant:
Tasha Barnett, Rachel M Anderson and Bryan L Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
San Miguel et al v. Jack et al
as 1:2023cv00697
Plaintiff:
Samuel San Miguel and Martin Lujan
Defendant:
Christy Jack, Marsha McLane, Jessica Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Watts
as 6:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
Rachel Watts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv02634
Petitioner:
Rachel Adams
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden FPC Bryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Butler v. TDCJ-CID Director et al
as 1:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Marcus Quin Butler
Defendant:
TDCJ Director, Tasha Barnett, Rachel M Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Espinoza v. Chapa
as 5:2022cv00068
Petitioner:
Jose Villalon Espinoza
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Arnoldo v. Chapa
as 5:2022cv00054
Petitioner:
Curiel Trevino Luis Arnoldo and Luis Arnoldo Curiel Trevino
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Garcia v. Chapa
as 5:2022cv00052
Petitioner:
Edson Santiesteban Garcia
Respondent:
Rachal Chapa and Rachel Chapa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Navarro-Escobedo v. Chapa
as 5:2022cv00051
Petitioner:
Victor Manuel Navarro-Escobedo
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Grizzle v. Mcintire et al
as 5:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Robert Grizzle
Defendant:
Bryson Mcintire, Madison Hendricks, Lindsay Hummel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
