Cases 1 - 10 of 24
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VASQUEZ v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
MARIO RAMIREZ VASQUEZ
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, JOHN MERSHON, STEPHEN R. HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whittenburg v. Lake County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Garrett Whittenburg
Defendant:
Lake County Jail, Warden, Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James et al v. Indiana Department of Correction et al
as 3:2022cv00723
Plaintiff:
Devoris James, Danny Horton, Anthony Gipson and others
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Correction, Ernest Pickens, Megan Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. USA
as 2:2022cv00231
Petitioner:
Rafael Roman Ramirez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
RAMIREZ-PRADO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv02601
Petitioner:
JOHN RAMIREZ-PRADO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RODRIGUEZ-RAMIREZ v. USA
as 3:2021cv00048
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
OSCAR RODRIGUEZ-RAMIREZ,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ramirez-Cruz v. Sheriff
as 3:2018cv01002
Petitioner:
Rigoberto Ramirez-Cruz
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RAMIREZ v. WARDEN
as 2:2018cv00297
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
NOE RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RAMIREZ v. USA
as 1:2016cv03342
Petitioner:
FELIPE LOPEZ RAMIREZ
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
