Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Richard Rapozo v. Attorney General for the State of Hawaii, et al
as 23-15769
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD B. RAPOZO
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF HAWAII, SHAWN WEAD, Director of Dept of Corrections and ANNE E. LOPEZ, Attorney General of the State of Hawaii
Rapozo v. Hawaii, State of
as 1:2023cv00188
Petitioner:
Richard B. Rapozo and Richard Ropozo and Richard Borges Rapozo
Respondent:
Attorney General Hawaii, State of, Warden Shawn Wead and Anne E. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rapozo v. Hawaii, State of
as 2:2023cv00261
Petitioner:
Richard B Rapozo and Richard Ropozo and Richard Borges Rapozo
Respondent:
Hawaii, State of, Shawn Wead and Anne E Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rapozo v. USA
as 1:2017cv00391
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Joseph Kaumuali'i Rapozo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Richard Rapozo v. Linda Lingle, et al
as 10-17146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD B. RAPOZO
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA LINGLE, Governor, State of Hawaii, CLAYTON FRANK, Director, Department of Public Safety and TOMMY JOHNSON
Rapozo v. Lingle et al
as 1:2010cv00493
Plaintiff:
Richard Borges Rapozo
Defendant:
Linda Lingle, Clayton Frank and Tammy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rapozo v. Bennett
as 1:2010cv00455
Petitioner:
Richard B. Rapozo
Respondent:
Mark J. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rapozo v. Griego et al
as 2:2010cv00587
Plaintiff:
Richard Borges Rapozo
Defendant:
Ben Griego, Unknown Carrier, Unknown Meiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rapozo v. Lingle et al
as 2:2008cv01310
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Rapozo
Defendant:
Linda Lingle, Clayton Frank, Tommy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-16384
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
