Cases 1 - 10 of 60
WILLIAMS v. TERRA et al
as 2:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
LAQUN RASHEED WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JOE TERRA, S. GRADY, LT. SPAGNOLLETI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RASHEED v. DISALVO et al
as 2:2022cv01871
Plaintiff:
ABDUL RASHEED
Defendant:
LT. DISALVO, CAPTAIN NEWMAN, E. ARMEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDANIELS v. STARKS et al
as 1:2022cv01816
Plaintiff:
Brandon Mcdaniels
Defendant:
c/o Starks, c/o Rasheed, SCI-Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDANIELS v. STARKS et al
as 2:2022cv04396
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MCDANIELS
Defendant:
C/O STARKS, C/O RASHEED and SCI-DALLAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
LA-QUN RASHEED WILLIAMS
Defendant:
FORMER SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, SECRETARY GEORGE LITTLE, MR. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RASHEED v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2021cv01513
Petitioner:
ABDUL RASHEED
Respondent:
WARDEN MARK CAPOZZA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF FAYETTE COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. NOWKOWSKI et al
as 1:2020cv00136
Defendant:
NOWKOWSKI, HEAD and JOHN DOE 1
Plaintiff:
LA-QUN RASHEED WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RASHEED v. MEYERS et al
as 2:2020cv00232
Defendant:
SGT. RANDY, ORLANDO HARPER, DANIEL MEYERS and others
Plaintiff:
ABDUL RASHEED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Rasheed v. Saez et al
as 3:2020cv00154
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Lt. Saez and Correctional Officer Unknown
Plaintiff:
Abdul Rasheed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2020cv00356
Defendant:
C/O S. BALDWIN, GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, SGT. ROYALS and others
Plaintiff:
RASHEED VAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
