Cases 1 - 10 of 317
Denelsbeck v. Ramirez et al
as 5:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
John Denelsbeck, III
Defendant:
Ricardo Ramirez, Jeremy J. Delacruz and Daniel Miranda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ismael Ortiz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ramirez v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00228
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ramirez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Enriquez v. Mares
as 6:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
Ricardo S. Enriquez
Respondent:
Warden FNU Mares
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zarate v. USA
as 3:2024cv00804
Petitioner:
Ricardo Hernandez Zarate
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ramirez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00263
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ramirez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cruz v. Mares
as 1:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Luis Hernandez Cruz
Defendant:
Ricardo Baca Mares
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welsh v. Management and Training Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Management and Training Corporation, Sergio Molina, Wayne Schmoker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guzman v. Warden, USP Marion
as 5:2024cv00191
Petitioner:
Ricardo Guzman
Respondent:
Warden, USP Marion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Island et al v. 441st District Court et al
as 4:2023cv01093
Petitioner:
Ricardo Island, Juanita Ruppelt and Philip Ruppelt
Respondent:
441st District Court, Midland County, North Texas State Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
