Cases 1 - 8 of 8
DAVIS v. USA
as 2:2024cv00334
Petitioner:
IKLAS RICHARD DAVIS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
DAVIS v. USA
as 2:2024cv00335
Petitioner:
IKLAS RICHARD DAVIS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
DAVIS v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv06344
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DAVIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. FARRELL et al
as 2:2013cv04294
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DAVIS
Defendant:
MICHELLE FARRELL and LOUIS GIORLA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2007cv00103
Petitioner:
RUSTY RICHARD DAVIES
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ERIE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2007cv00067
Petitioner:
RUSTY RICHARD DAVIES
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ERIE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2007cv00058
Petitioner:
RUSTY RICHARD DAVIES
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ERIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2007cv00047
Petitioner:
RUSTY RICHARD DAVIES
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ERIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
