Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Richards v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv00264
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Richards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Canterbury v. CoreCivic/Central Arizona Detention Center et al
as 2:2019cv02081
Defendant:
CoreCivic/Central Arizona Detention Center and United States Marshal Service
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Canterbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez-Torres et al v. Rosales et al
as 2:2018cv01233
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ramon Martinez-Torres and Araceli Toruga
Defendant:
Richard Lee Rosales, Unknown Rosales, Scott Nikolaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canterbury v. USA
as 2:2013cv00678
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Canterbury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Canterbury v. USA
as 2:2012cv02557
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Canterbury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Canterbury v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2012cv01916
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Canterbury
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Phoenix Police Department, Greg Stanton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Unknown Parties et al
as 2:2012cv00644
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Thompson
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Unknown Eagles and Unknown Esterline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Arizona, State of
as 3:2012cv08012
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Fields
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fields v. Diaz et al
as 3:2011cv08200
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Fields
Respondent:
Tira Diaz and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thompson v. Esterline et al
as 2:2011cv00014
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Thompson
Defendant:
Unknown Esterline, Unknown Eagles and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
