Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Chestnut v. Anderson et al
as 3:2023cv01478
Plaintiff:
Genard Denez Chestnut
Defendant:
Tony Anderson, David Snow, Michael Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nino v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv02107
Plaintiff:
Noel N. Nino
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Inv Robbin Lilly, Deputy Jordan Broderick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cenecharl v. Dixon et al
as 2:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
Jean Cenecharl
Defendant:
Mr. Dixon, Mark Jones, Captain Robbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cenecharl v. Dixon et al
as 2:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
Jean Cenecharl
Defendant:
Mr. Dixon, Mark Jones, Captain Robbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BERGER v. OBRIEN et al
as 3:2022cv24243
Plaintiff:
JACKIE BERGER
Defendant:
JOHN OBRIEN, JOHN DOE, ROBBINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURNS v. MAY et al
as 3:2022cv10927
Plaintiff:
CALVIN DUNELL BURNS
Defendant:
SCOTT MAY, ALEX CARRANZA, ROBBINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. ROBBINS et al
as 3:2022cv04903
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ALESHIA ROBBINS, SHEILA MELVIN, K M KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALTON v. WEBB et al
as 5:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
EDDIE JEROME WALTON
Defendant:
NATALIE WEBB, RUSSELL N ROBBINS and WADE MERCER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robbins v. Age et al
as 4:2022cv10013
Plaintiff:
Jackson Robbins
Defendant:
Tim Age, Jonathan Crane and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
OWENS v. LEAVINS et al
as 3:2021cv04815
Plaintiff:
ALBERT T OWENS, JR
Defendant:
DONALD LEAVINS, J SANTIAGO, J ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
