Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
WOMBLE v. PRELIPP et al
as 1:2014cv00568
Plaintiff: COREY WOMBLE
Defendant: CARRIE B. PRELIPP, G. C. GILLENWATER, ROBERT SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCullin v. Smith et al
as 4:2010cv00157
Defendant: Robert Smith, Darlyn White, Sergeant Williams and others
Plaintiff: Michael McCullin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCullin v. Smith et al
as 5:2010ct03194
Defendant: Robert Smith, Darlyn White, Sergeant Williams and others
Plaintiff: Michael McCullin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Batchelor et al
as 5:2008ct03111
Plaintiff: Drellco Lamont Hunter
Defendant: Michael Batchelor, Officer Gurganus, Boyd Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Richardson v. Smith
as 5:2007hc02213
Petitioner: David Louis Richardson
Respondent: Robert Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bodie v. Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2007cv00124
Petitioner: LeRoy Bodie, Jr.
Respondent: Robert Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reid v. Smith et al
as 5:2007ct03151
Plaintiff: Joseph Reid
Defendant: Robert Smith, Glenn Williams, Ajmad Gilami and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Smith et al
as 5:2007ct03147
Plaintiff: Robert Steven Hill
Defendant: Robert Smith, Beck, Forehand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. SMITH et al
as 1:2007cv00734
Petitioner: JACOB PAUL BAKER
Respondent: ROBERT SMITH and THEODIS BECK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCullen v. Smith et al
as 5:2007hc02160
Petitioner: Felix J. McCullen
Defendant: Robert Smith and Theodis Beck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?