Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Irwin v. Cohen et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00433
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Irwin
Defendant:
Alan Cohen and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mays v. Thomas et al
as 5:2017cv00774
Petitioner:
Robert Thomas Mays
Respondent:
Warden Thomas and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Conrad v. Dunn et al
as 1:2017cv00107
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Conrad
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Grant Culliver, Cynthia Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Calhoun County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2014cv01700
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Jenkins
Defendant:
Calhoun County Sheriff's Department, Big Easy Bail Bonding and Chris Jacobs
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Lodewick et al
as 1:2014cv01060
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Jenkins
Defendant:
Peter Lodewick and Dru Lawler
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Myers et al
as 1:2010cv00576
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Mays
Defendant:
Walter Myers, James Dunn and Quentin Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Ferrell
as 1:2010cv00028
Petitioner:
Robert Thomas Mays
Respondent:
Jerry Ferrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conrad v. Culliver et al (INMATE3)
as 1:2008cv00032
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Conrad
Defendant:
Grant Culliver and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mays v. Roden et al
as 5:2007cv00780
Petitioner:
Robert Thomas Mays
Defendant:
J Tyler Roden, Tim Creel, Mark Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
