Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Sanders #146274 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin Sanders
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Centurion of Arizona LLC, Ryan Thornell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Robles-Pujals v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv02340
Plaintiff:
Carianne Robles-Pujals
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff Office, Maricopa County Estrella Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv01597
Plaintiff:
Briana Robles Martinez
Defendant:
Paul Penzone and Clint Hickman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Perez et al
as 2:2023cv01020
Plaintiff:
Marcellus D K Jackson
Defendant:
Unknown Perez, Unknown Robles and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Walker et al
as 2:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
Michael Rogers
Defendant:
Gerald Walker, B Nale, Unknown Sebastian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
Troy Henry
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Unknown Robles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Robles v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv00267
Petitioner:
Gator Robles
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell and Kris Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Robles et al
as 2:2021cv02098
Plaintiff:
Oscar Cipriano Rodriguez
Defendant:
Unknown Robles, Unknown Troop and Unknown McGrew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drew #048508 v. Paul et al
as 2:2021cv01488
Plaintiff:
Tommy D Drew
Defendant:
Theodora Paul, Renae Furar, Donna Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Uselton v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv02141
Defendant:
David Shinn, Centurian Managed Care, E Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
John Stevenson Uselton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
