Cases 1 - 10 of 206
McQueen v. Lamar
as 1:2024cv00346
Petitioner:
Roger McQueen
Respondent:
David Lamar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Webb v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00593
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Morrice Rogers and David Lamar
Plaintiff:
Sergio Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greer v. Hamm et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00566
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Captain Rogers and David Lamar
Plaintiff:
Dennis Wayne Greer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy v. Rogers et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00476
Defendant:
Pamela Whitten, Tiffany Rogers and Tramon Rogers
Plaintiff:
Randi Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Cedric Orlando Young
Defendant:
Bonner, S Mitchell, Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCreary v. State of Alabama
as 1:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Roger Lee McCreary
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Rogers (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
James Leslie Bailey
Defendant:
Captain Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caswell v. Horton et al
as 4:2023cv01380
Defendant:
Cassi R Peek, Kristen Ward, Sheriff Jonathon Horton and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Caswell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Rogers et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
James Leslie Bailey
Defendant:
Captain Rogers, Captain Norman and Brian Thompkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. D.O.C. State of Alabama
as 2:2023cv01222
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Ernest Rogers
Defendant:
D.O.C. State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
