Cases 1 - 10 of 11
BROWN v. CENTURION HEALTH, et al
as 1:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
ROJAE BROWN
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, TEAH, JOHN CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROJAS-REYES v. USA
as 1:2021cv02184
Petitioner:
RAFAEL ROJAS-REYES
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Martin v. Redden et al
as 3:2018cv00595
Defendant:
Domonique, Crawford, Rhonda Brenna and others
Undetermined:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Anthony C Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv02498
Petitioner:
ROJAE BROWN
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. O'Neil et al
as 3:2016cv00737
Plaintiff:
Anthony C Martin
Defendant:
Ron O'Neil, Indiana State Prison, Indiana Department of Corrections and others
Miscellaneous_party:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. O'NEIL et al
as 1:2016cv02847
Defendant:
7 UNKNOWN E-SQUAD (GERT) OFFICERS, ANTON, PAM BANE and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY C. MARTIN
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only) and PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2016cv00573
Petitioner:
ROJAE BROWN
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROJAS v. U.S. DISTRICT COURT
as 2:2015cv00345
Plaintiff:
CRISTOBAL T. ROJAS
Defendant:
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHEELER v. WILSON et al
as 2:2014cv00210
Defendant:
AVA ROTELL DUSTIN, GUILLERMO J. ROJAS, UNKNOWN OHIO AND INDIANA AGENTS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE WHEELER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rojas v. USA
as 2:2008cv00321
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Gerardo Rojas
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
