Cases 1 - 10 of 16
ROJAS v. FBOP et al
as 1:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
EDGAR ROJAS
Defendant:
FBOP, FCI FORT DIX WARDEN and DHS DEPARMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAWFORD v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2023cv23002
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY M. CRAWFORD
Defendant:
WARDEN KAREN TAYLOR, DEPUTY WARDEN REBECCA FRANCESCHINI, SGT. LISA ROJAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILBERT v. FRANCESCHINI et al
as 1:2023cv22633
Plaintiff:
JIHAD A. GILBERT
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN REBECCA FRANCESCHINI, WARDEN KAREN TAYLOR, SGT. LISA ROJAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROJAS-GARCIA v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv03299
Petitioner:
TYRON ROJAS-GARCIA
Respondent:
STEVIE M. KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NEILIO v. CAMDEN COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv02702
Plaintiff:
MORGAN NEILIO
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY, KAREN TAYLOR, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROJAS v. CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 1:2021cv16006
Plaintiff:
JOSE A. ROJAS
Defendant:
CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, TRISH C., MARLEEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRUZ v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 1:2019cv20906
Defendant:
DET. DANIEL CHOE, PROSECUTORS OFFICE, DET. JOSE RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff:
JAVIAR ROJAS CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCFADDEN v. PASSAIC COUNTY
as 2:2017cv11670
Defendant:
PASSAIC COUNTY , ANTHONY J. DE NOVA, III , RICHARD A. ASHLEY and others
Plaintiff:
KENDELL SHAREEK MCFADDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROJAS v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06702
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL ROJAS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROJAS-ALVARADO v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2016cv03460
Petitioner:
SEFERINO ROJAS-ALVARADO
Respondent:
JORDAN HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
