Cases 1 - 10 of 19
MILLER v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC et al
as 2:2013cv06262
Plaintiff:
TYRIE ROMEO MILLER
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC and TRACY WILLIAMS, RN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEATH v. ZIEGLER et al
as 1:2013cv00279
Plaintiff:
JORDAN MARCEL ROMEO HEATH
Defendant:
ELIZABETH A. ZIEGLER and SCI FOREST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEATH v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2013cv00276
Plaintiff:
JORDAN MARCEL ROMEO HEATH
Defendant:
OVERMYER and ELIZABETH A. ZIEGLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEATH v. SAUERS et al
as 1:2013cv00275
Plaintiff:
JORDAN MARCEL ROMEO HEATH
Defendant:
DEBRA K. SAUERS and PA STATE POLICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2013cv03735
Plaintiff:
TYRIE ROMEO MILLER
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC. and TRACY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOLEY v. BROOKS et al
as 1:2010cv00185
Petitioner:
ROMEO COOLEY
Respondent:
M. BROOKS, SOBINA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
v. Mauer et al
as 1:2009cv01915
Plaintiff:
Keynen Guider
Defendant:
Dean Mauer, K. Merrow, J. Romeo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGO v. THE WARDEN OF FSL ELKTON et al
as 3:2009cv00014
Plaintiff:
AMAYA HUGO
Defendant:
THE WARDEN OF FSL ELKTON, MR. P. HARVEY, MD, MRS. R. MEECE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cabello v. Grace et al
as 1:2008cv01334
Plaintiff:
David Cabello
Defendant:
James L. Grace, Angela Auman, Olga Beragovskaya, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Washington v. Grace et al
as 4:2008cv01283
Plaintiff:
Henry Unseld Washington
Defendant:
James L. Grace, David J. Wakefield, R. M. Lawler and others
Amicu:
G C Berger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
