Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Drakos v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2024cv00531
Petitioner:
Ronald Thomas Drakos, II
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Drakos v. Gonzalez
as 4:2024cv00534
Petitioner:
Ronald Thomas Drakos, II
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Drakos v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas Drakos, II
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez, Melissa Morris and Harris County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Ogg et al
as 2:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas
Defendant:
Kim Ogg, Ken Paxton, Molly Wurzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Texas Dept of Criminal Justice et al
as 2:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas
Defendant:
Texas Dept of Criminal Justice, Bobby Lumpkin, Warden Flannel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Wooten v. Federal Medical Center, Lexington, et al
as 23-5281
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD THOMAS WOOTEN
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER, LEXINGTON, JOHN DOE, Warden, LT. LAWSON and others
Drakos II v. Fagan
as 4:2023cv00111
Petitioner:
Ronald Thomas Drakos II
Respondent:
Eric Fagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Drakos v. Fagan
as 4:2022cv01765
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas Drakos, II
Defendant:
Eric Fagan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drakos v. Fagen
as 4:2022cv01854
Petitioner:
Robert Thomas Drakos, II and Ronald Thomas Drakos, II
Respondent:
Eric Fagen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wooten v. Federal Medical Center Lexington
as 5:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas Wooten
Defendant:
Federal Medical Center Lexington, John Doe, Lt. Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
