Cases 1 - 10 of 54
King v. Rose et al
as 1:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Jacorey King
Defendant:
Warden Rose, Officer McCrainey, Unknown Transportation Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamner v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv02007
Petitioner:
Steffany Rose Hamner
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Department of Children Services and Davidson County Juvenile Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vaughn v. Starta et al
as 1:2024cv01009
Plaintiff:
Sebastian D. Vaughn and Arion J. Boggs
Defendant:
Frank Starta, FNU Giles, FNU Pulawski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tatum v. Rose et al
as 1:2023cv01174
Plaintiff:
Dustin Seth Tatum
Defendant:
Sharon Rose, Cynthia Casagrande, Steve Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamby v. Hopper et al
as 1:2023cv01130
Plaintiff:
William D. Hamby, Jr.
Defendant:
Allison Hopper, Robert Beham, Jessica Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singleton v. Page et al
as 1:2023cv01120
Plaintiff:
Timothy Singleton
Defendant:
Todd Page, Shannon Rose, Frank Strada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nagorny v. Dotson et al
as 1:2023cv01119
Plaintiff:
Henry Joshua Nagorny
Defendant:
Lee Dotson, Sharon Rose, Northwest Correctional Complex Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ledford v. Rose
as 4:2023cv00018
Petitioner:
Timothy Leon Ledford
Respondent:
Sharon Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ledford v. Rose
as 3:2023cv00470
Petitioner:
Timothy Leon Ledford
Respondent:
Sharon Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winters v. Ward
as 1:2023cv01032
Plaintiff:
Trumaine Winters
Defendant:
Yolanda R. Ward and Rose Sharon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
