Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Jackson v. Collier
as 23-20547
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roy Jackson
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Oscar Mendoza, Assistant Executive Director of Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
Jackson v. Securus Tech, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Roy Jackson
Defendant:
Securus Tech, LLC, Roxanna LNU and FNU LNU 1:23-cv-211
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. ACLU NATIONAL PRISON PROJECT
as 1:2023cv03200
Plaintiff:
ROY JACKSON
Defendant:
ACLU NATIONAL PRISON PROJECT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv03950
Plaintiff:
Roy Jackson
Defendant:
Byran Collier, Oscar Mendoza, The TDCJ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Amonet et al
as 2:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Roy Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Adrian Amonet, Assistant Warden P. Samaniego and TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Zuniga et al
as 2:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Roy Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Isabell Zuniga and Unknown Employees of the TDCJ McConnell Unit, State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Blackfeet Enrollment Office
as 4:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Roy Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Blackfeet Enrollment Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Hanen
as 23-20264
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roy Jackson
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew Hanen and Court Administration
Jackson v. TDCJ
as 1:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Roy Jackson
Defendant:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Blackfeet Enrollment Office
as 4:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Roy Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Blackfeet Enrollment Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
