Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Ruffin v. Cain
as 3:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Travis Jerome Ruffin
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larry v. Maint. Training Corp. et al
as 3:2021cv00655
Plaintiff:
Adrian Larry
Defendant:
Maint. Training Corp., Personnel Employed at said fac., East Miss Correc. Fac. and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruffin v. Porter et al
as 3:2020cv00335
Defendant:
Warden J.J. Williams, D. Warden B. Tyler, Sgt. L. Pigeon and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery D. Ruffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ruffin v. State of MS
as 1:2020cv00287
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Mark Ruffin
Defendant:
State of MS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Shaw et al
as 3:2020cv00337
Defendant:
Warden Frank Shaw, MDOC, Major Christopher Dykes and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Broderick B. Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv00533
Defendant:
Centurion of Mississippi, Inc., Unknown Nagel, Norris Hogans and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jason Bruce Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Benton et al
as 3:2018cv00376
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Campbell
Defendant:
Unknown Benton, Unknown Kelly and LeMarcus Ruffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruffin v. Sollie
as 3:2017cv00502
Plaintiff:
Mark Ruffin
Defendant:
Billy Sollie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ruffin v. Sollie
as 3:2017cv00503
Plaintiff:
Mark Ruffin
Defendant:
Billy Sollie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Campbell v. Dykes et al
as 3:2017cv00184
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Campbell
Defendant:
Unknown Dykes, Unknown Ruffin, Unknown Hardaway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
