Cases 1 - 10 of 1,081
Broadhead v. Gillion et al
as 2:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Kenneth Gillion, S Moore, Phyllis Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Cedric Orlando Young
Defendant:
Bonner, S Mitchell, Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greene v. Pipes et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Raymond Shane Greene
Defendant:
Wesley S. Pipes, Mary B. Windom, Mark S. Tunstall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Florence v. Red Eagle Work Center et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Florence
Defendant:
Red Eagle Work Center and Norteshia S. Honaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caswell v. Horton et al
as 4:2023cv01380
Defendant:
Cassi R Peek, Kristen Ward, Sheriff Jonathon Horton and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Caswell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sumpter v. Butler et al
as 1:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
LaJuan Anthony Sumpter and Lajuan Sumpter
Defendant:
Reosha Butler, Jefferson S. Dunn and Officer Nickols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ringold v. Burch et al
as 1:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Marcus S. Ringold
Defendant:
Paul Burch, Sam Houston, Pat Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Turman et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
John S. Smith
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
