Cases 1 - 10 of 661
Davis v. Kirk et al
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Cory J. Davis
Defendant:
Alan S. Kirk, Ashley Scott, Kari Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
Tony S. Walker
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00159
Petitioner:
Nathaniel S Robinson
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blevins v. Ellers et al
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Bryan S Blevins
Defendant:
Brian Ellers and Aaron White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rayford, Jr v. Montgomery County et al
as 3:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Larry Rayford, Jr
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Charles S. Bloodworth, Jaclyn M. Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Willis v. Whittamore et al
as 3:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Howard Willis
Defendant:
Abigail Whittamore, Raymond Moyer, Zachary Pound and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carmody v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024mc00002
Plaintiff:
Patrick S. Carmody
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Frank Strada, Lee Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Phillips et al
as 3:2023cv01338
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Moore
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
