Cases 1 - 9 of 9
George Hamilton v. David Tristan, et al
as 12-15501
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID TRISTAN, Former Chief Deputy Director, EDWARD ALAMEIDA, THOMAS MOORE, Former Assistant Director and others
Hamilton v. Tristan et al
as 2:2011cv01166
Plaintiff:
George Hamilton
Defendant:
David Tristan, Edward Alameida, Thomas - Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Tristan et al
as 1:2011cv00788
Plaintiff:
George Hamilton
Defendant:
David Tristan, Edward Alameida, Thomas - Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan Ransom v. Secretary of California Dept., et al
as 11-15838
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN EDWIN RANSOM
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY OF CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION, C GREAVES, P. WILSON and others
Ransom v. Department of Corrections & Rehabilitations, et al.
as 1:2011cv00068
Plaintiff:
Bryan E. Ransom
Defendant:
Secretary of California Dept. of Corrections & Rehalibations, C. Greaves, P. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryan Ransom v. Secretary of Dept. of Corr., et al
as 10-17856
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN EDWIN RANSOM
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, ADAMS, Warden, S. WORTMAN and others
Ransom v. Secretary of Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
as 1:2010cv01423
Plaintiff:
Bryan E. Ransom
Defendant:
Secretary of Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Adams, S. Wortman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Adams et al
as 1:2010cv00726
Plaintiff:
Stanley Sims
Defendant:
D. G. Adams, R. Rosenthal and S. Wortman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shorter v. Rosenthal et al
as 1:2010cv00610
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shorter
Defendant:
R. Rosenthal, CDCR, California State Prison, Corcoran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
